We Received A Signal. We Are Not Sure What To Do With This Information.

ORC DISPATCH · MISSION REPORT · ORC-2024-338 · PARTIAL CLEARANCE · SIGNAL SECTION: REVIEWED BY L. SANDHU · CLASSIFICATION: PENDING
MISSION REF / ORC-2024-338 · FILED 19 DEC 2024 · PUBLISHED 22 MAY 2026 · CLASSIFICATION ONGOING
We Received A Signal. We Are Not Sure What To Do With This Information.
GEO Standard Retrieval · S-01 · ORC-V1 “Maud” · Nov–Dec 2024
Outcome
SUCCESS
Duration
38 days
Signal events
3
Filed by
A. Kowalski
APPROVED: M. HARGREAVES · LEGAL: L. SANDHU (ONGOING) · SIGNAL DATA: RETAINED · NOTE: THE MISSION WAS SUCCESSFUL. THE SIGNAL SECTION IS SEPARATE. PLEASE READ BOTH.
ORC-2024-338 · GEO ORBIT · 35,786 KM · SIGNAL RECEIVED: DAYS 14 / 22 / 30 · DURATION: 4.2s · CLASSIFICATION: PENDING
SIGNAL LOG · ORC-2024-338 · MISSION DAYS 1–38 CLICK TO EXPAND
TIMESTAMP
SOURCE
NATURE
Day 07 · 14:22
INTERNAL
Routine telemetry ping. All systems nominal.
Standard day 7 check-in. Maud at transit altitude. All systems within normal parameters. Mission proceeding as planned. Nothing to note. This entry included for completeness.
Day 14 · 03:11
UNKNOWN
Unregistered signal received on standard uplink frequency. Duration: 4.2 seconds. Origin: unverified.
Maud received a 4.2-second signal on her standard uplink frequency during the approach phase. The signal did not match any registered format in our communications library. A. Kowalski logged it as “signal event 1” and flagged it to Dr. Chen. Dr. Chen reviewed the waveform data. Dr. Chen’s initial response was to sit quietly for approximately four minutes before saying “I don’t know.” We have retained the waveform data. It is in a folder labelled “HOLD.”
Day 14 · 08:44
INTERNAL
M. Hargreaves informed of signal event 1. Decision: continue mission. Log signal. Do not speculate.
M. Hargreaves was briefed on the signal at 08:44 BST. M. Hargreaves asked three questions: (1) was the mission compromised? No. (2) was Maud operating normally? Yes. (3) should we tell the client? We said we were not sure. M. Hargreaves said “continue the mission, log the signal, do not speculate.” This became the operating policy for the remainder of the mission.
Day 22 · 03:11
UNKNOWN
Second signal received. Same frequency. Same duration. Same time of day. Partial translation attempted.
Precisely eight days after signal event 1, at precisely 03:11, a second signal was received on the same frequency for the same 4.2-second duration. This is either a coincidence or it is not. Dr. Chen attempted a partial translation using three different frameworks. One framework produced what he described as “probably noise.” One produced “inconclusive.” One produced a three-word sequence that Dr. Chen has declined to include in any written document pending further review. The three-word sequence is in the HOLD folder. The HOLD folder is in a locked drawer. A. Kowalski does not have a key to the drawer.
Day 22 · 14:00
INTERNAL
Mission continues. Capture phase initiated. Maud performing nominally.
Per M. Hargreaves’ standing instruction: continue the mission, log the signal, do not speculate. Capture phase initiated. Maud performing nominally. The mission was the priority. We focused on the mission. This was the correct decision. We are still focusing on the mission. The signal is in the HOLD folder.
Day 30 · 03:11
UNKNOWN
Third signal. Same parameters. Post-capture phase. Content: partial translation suggests acknowledgement of completed activity.
Eight days after signal event 2, at 03:11, a third and final signal was received. Maud had completed capture on day 28. The third signal arrived two days after capture. Dr. Chen’s partial translation of signal event 3, which he has agreed to include in this report after what he described as “considerable internal deliberation,” suggests the content was broadly an acknowledgement of completed activity. We do not know whose activity. We do not know whose acknowledgement. We have noted it. The mission continued and concluded successfully. We are not drawing conclusions. We are simply noting that it happened three times, each time eight days apart, each time at 03:11, and that the third one came after we finished the job.
SIGNAL EVENTS: 3 · SOURCE: UNVERIFIED · DATA: RETAINED · CONCLUSIONS: NONE DRAWN OFFICIALLY · HOLD FOLDER: LOCKED
01 / THE OFFICIAL ACCOUNT (MISSION)CLEARED

ORC-V1 “Maud” completed a GEO standard retrieval for an international satellite operator. The object, a defunct communications satellite, was retrieved from GEO arc and transferred to graveyard orbit at GEO+304 km. The mission was completed within the planned timeline. Full regulatory filing and post-mission documentation were issued within 14 working days. The mission is considered complete and successful in all operational respects.

01b / THE OFFICIAL ACCOUNT (SIGNAL)PARTIAL CLEARANCE

During the mission, ORC received three unregistered signals on Maud’s standard uplink frequency. The signals occurred on days 14, 22, and 30, each at 03:11 BST, each lasting 4.2 seconds. The origin of the signals could not be verified using any registered communications source. The signals were logged, retained, and referred to Dr. Chen for analysis. Dr. Chen’s analysis is ongoing. The signals did not affect mission operations. We are not drawing conclusions from this at this time.

The mission itself proceeded without incident. Maud reached GEO arc on schedule. The object was where it was supposed to be. Maud captured it cleanly on day 28, repositioned it to graveyard orbit, and returned to standby. This part of the report is straightforward.

The signal section is less straightforward.

When the first signal arrived on day 14, A. Kowalski’s instinct was to log it as a telemetry anomaly and move on. The signal did not match any known format. It was not from the client. It was not from any ground station we use. It was not equipment noise, which has a recognisable signature. It was [REDACTED].

When the second signal arrived eight days later, at the same time, at the same frequency, for the same duration, A. Kowalski called Dr. Chen immediately. Dr. Chen said [REDACTED]. M. Hargreaves was briefed. M. Hargreaves said: continue the mission, log the signal, do not speculate.

We continued the mission. We logged the signal. We did not, officially, speculate. The capture was completed on day 28. Two days later, at 03:11, the third signal arrived. The mission was functionally complete. The object was in graveyard orbit. Maud was in transit back.

The third signal has been partially translated by Dr. Chen. Dr. Chen’s working interpretation is that it represents an acknowledgement of a completed activity. We do not know whose activity they were acknowledging. The timing — two days after capture — is [REDACTED].

There have been no further signals since mission completion. We do not know whether this is because the signals have stopped, or because [REDACTED]. We are monitoring.

03 / MISSION STATISTICSVERIFIED · SIGNAL DATA: SEPARATE LOG
Service tierS-01 Standard Retrieval
VehicleORC-V1 “Maud”
AltitudeGEO · 35,786 km
Mission duration38 days
CaptureDay 28. Clean.
Graveyard orbit achievedGEO + 304 km
Mission anomalies0
Signal events3 (separate from mission operations)
Signal interval8 days exactly (×2)
Signal time03:11 BST (×3)
Signal duration4.2 seconds (×3)
Signal origin verifiedNo
Partial translation availableYes. In HOLD folder. Folder is locked.
Conclusions drawnNone. Officially.
Further signals since missionNone recorded to date.
  • The signal monitoring protocol for GEO missions has been updated. All uplink frequencies are now continuously logged during active mission phases, with automatic flagging for any signal that does not match a registered format. This was sensible practice regardless of ORC-2024-338. We should have done it earlier. We are doing it now.
  • Dr. Chen’s analysis of the signal data is ongoing. Dr. Chen has requested additional processing time. Dr. Chen has requested access to reference databases that ORC does not hold. We have made enquiries about those databases. The enquiries have been interesting. We are not putting anything further in writing about the enquiries.
  • The operational decision to continue the mission in the presence of unexplained signal events was correct. The signals did not affect Maud’s systems. The mission objective was clear. We completed it. This is what ORC does. We do not stop retrievals because of things we cannot explain. We log them, we file them, and we call Dr. Chen.
  • M. Hargreaves has reviewed this report and approved it for external publication on the grounds that full disclosure of the signal events is preferable to partial disclosure, and that the most honest description of our position is that we received three unexplained signals, completed the mission, and do not currently know what the signals were. This report is that disclosure. We stand by it.
  • Maud returns to GEO arc in June 2026 for ORC-2026-118. We are monitoring. If there is a subsequent signal event, there will be a subsequent report. We will publish it.
SIGNAL DATA The raw signal data from ORC-2024-338 is retained in full and has been submitted to Dr. Chen’s astrodynamics team for ongoing analysis. We are not accepting enquiries about the signal data at this time. OCELOT is offline. L. Sandhu is reviewing the classification status. We will update this report when there is something to update.
MISSION NOTE The retrieval itself — the object, Maud, the graveyard transfer — was a routine S-01 GEO mission completed successfully and on time. We want to be clear about this. The signal section of this report is separate from the mission outcome. The mission was fine. We are good at this. See service specification.
END OF REPORT · ORC-2024-338 · ORS/L/2011/0042 · MISSION: COMPLETE · SIGNAL: HOLD FOLDER · MONITORING: ONGOING

Similar Posts